Menu
Home
Post Something
Forums
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
News & Features
The Marketplace
Cars for Sale
Engine and Performance
Chassis and Wheels
Exterior and Body
Interior and Cockpit
ICE - In Car Entertainment
Car Shops and Services
Toys and Wares
All Other Stuff
Jobs and Vacancies
Looking For
Members
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
See what others are reading now! Try Forums >
Current Activity
Home
Forums
Main Forums
Car Talk
Forced Induction & Engine Management
Response Or Peak Power?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="f8." data-source="post: 83059" data-attributes="member: 541"><p>this question is like an onion. there are so many layers and you can peel away as many as you want but you're still looking at the same thing ultimately.</p><p></p><p>this is quite a tricky question because the question can be interpreted in a number of ways. also we should try to be realistic and practical, or at least have a common agreement to what we mean by response as in how much response do we consider responsive and what we mean by peak power as in how much more or less peak power in relation to which ballpark figure are we considering?</p><p></p><p>i think the easy answer would be a nice mix of both. surely too much response with too little peak power or too much peak power with no response whatsoever that you probably never hit the peak power rpm would both be bad.</p><p></p><p>if we take the stock car configuration as a benchmark, then it'd be good if we can have more response and also more peak power than stock. to me, its nice to have a car that is eager under part throttle conditions, ie every little step more on the throttle gives more torque, whatever the rpm. it would also be nice if the increments of torque is quite linear to throttle input, rather than say a setup where there is virtually no difference between 0-80%throttle, then suddenly in the last 20% of throttle the car shoots off like a rocket.</p><p></p><p>as for power, it would be nice to have a car that has more and more power as the revs build all the way to redline. ie there's a climax at the end, rather than a flat power delivery like that of the rx8, it just revs and revs but never reaches a peak(i borrow this from nick aka gti88 ;) ).</p><p></p><p>also by response do we mean the rpm that the turbo begins to make useful boost, or the true response of the turbo once there is sufficient revs to boil it. i have mentioned this in the past.</p><p></p><p>say we have 2 turbos. both on a 4g63. one is the original td05 16g, and the other one is a hks gt2835. on the same engine, we set the boost limit at 1bar for both. on the td05 16g, it hits 1bar by 3000rpm and the car really pulls. with the gt2835, it only hits 1bar at 4000rpm. in both cases we start the test in 5th gear at 2000rpm and floor the throttle.</p><p></p><p>so on this account the td05 16g has better response. now we go and do another test. we accelerate in 5th gear to 5500rpm, then back off throttle completely. when the revs drop to 4500rpm, we suddenly whack full throttle and using an ecu with a datalogger, go back to see at 4500rpm when you suddenly stab the throttle, what was the time taken for the td05 16g and gt2835 to hit 1bar.</p><p></p><p>we then repeat this test from say 10% throttle at 4500rpm and immediately throttle to 80% and log the time it takes each turbo to hit 1bar.</p><p></p><p>now, i might be completely wrong here. the 16g is a smaller and lighter wheel. but i suspect, i stress here, suspect, the gt2835 will have better times shown on the data logger. of course if we did the test a bit differently at different rpms and/or different throttle settings and/or boost the results will be different. but to me, this is what i mean by response. once you get going, how fast the turbo reacts to your inputs. response to me is not so simple as turbo lag rpm. after all, if you're a car nut, you should drive with more enthusiasm and downshift if you really need to get going so rpm turbo lag shouldn't really be such a problem.</p><p></p><p>oh but to answer the question, of course response! this is a street car man!! :D</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="f8., post: 83059, member: 541"] this question is like an onion. there are so many layers and you can peel away as many as you want but you're still looking at the same thing ultimately. this is quite a tricky question because the question can be interpreted in a number of ways. also we should try to be realistic and practical, or at least have a common agreement to what we mean by response as in how much response do we consider responsive and what we mean by peak power as in how much more or less peak power in relation to which ballpark figure are we considering? i think the easy answer would be a nice mix of both. surely too much response with too little peak power or too much peak power with no response whatsoever that you probably never hit the peak power rpm would both be bad. if we take the stock car configuration as a benchmark, then it'd be good if we can have more response and also more peak power than stock. to me, its nice to have a car that is eager under part throttle conditions, ie every little step more on the throttle gives more torque, whatever the rpm. it would also be nice if the increments of torque is quite linear to throttle input, rather than say a setup where there is virtually no difference between 0-80%throttle, then suddenly in the last 20% of throttle the car shoots off like a rocket. as for power, it would be nice to have a car that has more and more power as the revs build all the way to redline. ie there's a climax at the end, rather than a flat power delivery like that of the rx8, it just revs and revs but never reaches a peak(i borrow this from nick aka gti88 ;) ). also by response do we mean the rpm that the turbo begins to make useful boost, or the true response of the turbo once there is sufficient revs to boil it. i have mentioned this in the past. say we have 2 turbos. both on a 4g63. one is the original td05 16g, and the other one is a hks gt2835. on the same engine, we set the boost limit at 1bar for both. on the td05 16g, it hits 1bar by 3000rpm and the car really pulls. with the gt2835, it only hits 1bar at 4000rpm. in both cases we start the test in 5th gear at 2000rpm and floor the throttle. so on this account the td05 16g has better response. now we go and do another test. we accelerate in 5th gear to 5500rpm, then back off throttle completely. when the revs drop to 4500rpm, we suddenly whack full throttle and using an ecu with a datalogger, go back to see at 4500rpm when you suddenly stab the throttle, what was the time taken for the td05 16g and gt2835 to hit 1bar. we then repeat this test from say 10% throttle at 4500rpm and immediately throttle to 80% and log the time it takes each turbo to hit 1bar. now, i might be completely wrong here. the 16g is a smaller and lighter wheel. but i suspect, i stress here, suspect, the gt2835 will have better times shown on the data logger. of course if we did the test a bit differently at different rpms and/or different throttle settings and/or boost the results will be different. but to me, this is what i mean by response. once you get going, how fast the turbo reacts to your inputs. response to me is not so simple as turbo lag rpm. after all, if you're a car nut, you should drive with more enthusiasm and downshift if you really need to get going so rpm turbo lag shouldn't really be such a problem. oh but to answer the question, of course response! this is a street car man!! :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
The Marketplace Latest
Mitsubishi lancer Evo x front bumper
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Honda jazz fit gk flrs body kit
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Proton S70 body kit
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Proton saga BLM body kit
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Perodua bezza ~accident repair
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Mercedes Benz W205 C-class GT grille
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW E90 ~brake caliper spray ~rim spray
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Honda city gm6 FL front bumper
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
original rare spec Rays Volk Racing RE30 15x7jj...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
original rare Rays Volk Racing TE37 SAGA S-Plus...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
Posts refresh every 5 minutes
Teh Tarik Session
I am new here,and I am really looking forward to have a TT session with you guys Otai Airtrek.
max speed?
Hello guys and girls :)
Just wanna ask, what's the max speed that you have done with your stock Z.. i mean completely stock.. no turbocharged or supercharged.. oh well, maybe change of exhaust :p
I did 215kmph and...
wondering price of 95 R33 GTS25t with a bunch of mods...
has hicas all wheel steering. mods include: apex intercooler, greddy BOV, greddy turbo, HKS air filter, greddy exhaust, faze turbo gauge, HKS exhaust temp, water temp, oil temp, racing clutch(not sure of make). few...
Recent Posts
Thrills and Spills at Zhuhai: Porsche Carrera Cup Asia Rounds 3 & 4 Recap
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Proton Records High Demand for S70 with 1 Unit Booked every 4 minutes
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Toyota Malaysia Enters Regional GT Racing with TGR Racing Malaysia
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Home Win and Double Podium for Akash Nandy at Sepang Season Opener
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Darker Design : Mercedes-Benz Launches GLA Nightfall Edition in Malaysia
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Search
Online now
Enjoying Zerotohundred?
Log-in
for an ad-less experience
Home
Forums
Main Forums
Car Talk
Forced Induction & Engine Management
Response Or Peak Power?