http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2005/9/15/nation/12046004&sec=nation
PETALING JAYA: The tale of the two feuding south Indian food restaurants here took a fresh twist yesterday when the municipal authority demolished the awnings from the two shops, deeming them illegal extensions.
Both restaurants had been given notices one-and-a-half months ago by the Petaling Jaya Municipal Council (MPPJ) asking them to dismantle the illegal awnings and banisters.
Yesterday, MPPJ workers also took down the signage of one of the shops, which had not obtained its business licence.
MPPJ councillor V. Subramaniam said the shops had extended their business by placing tables and chairs on the walkway and that it was illegal.
“We also do not want the repeat of the tragedy, where a car ploughed into people eating by the roadside,” he said.
The Star reported last month that the rivalry between the two restaurants with the same name had become a hot topic among the residents in Section 11.
The two not only share the same name but their waiters also wear the same purple uniforms.
1) illegal awnings and banisters
2) not obtained business license to put up signage
3) tables and chairs on walkway
many mamak restaurants and mamak stalls still enjoying their illegal awnings and banisters, will the authorities gona do something about them ?
many mamak restaurants and mamak stalls still puting up signage without business licence and permit, will the authorities gona do something about them ?
many mamak restaurants and mamak stalls still placing tables and chairs on walkway, will the authorities gona do something about them ?
discuss
PETALING JAYA: The tale of the two feuding south Indian food restaurants here took a fresh twist yesterday when the municipal authority demolished the awnings from the two shops, deeming them illegal extensions.
Both restaurants had been given notices one-and-a-half months ago by the Petaling Jaya Municipal Council (MPPJ) asking them to dismantle the illegal awnings and banisters.
Yesterday, MPPJ workers also took down the signage of one of the shops, which had not obtained its business licence.
MPPJ councillor V. Subramaniam said the shops had extended their business by placing tables and chairs on the walkway and that it was illegal.
“We also do not want the repeat of the tragedy, where a car ploughed into people eating by the roadside,” he said.
The Star reported last month that the rivalry between the two restaurants with the same name had become a hot topic among the residents in Section 11.
The two not only share the same name but their waiters also wear the same purple uniforms.
1) illegal awnings and banisters
2) not obtained business license to put up signage
3) tables and chairs on walkway
many mamak restaurants and mamak stalls still enjoying their illegal awnings and banisters, will the authorities gona do something about them ?
many mamak restaurants and mamak stalls still puting up signage without business licence and permit, will the authorities gona do something about them ?
many mamak restaurants and mamak stalls still placing tables and chairs on walkway, will the authorities gona do something about them ?
discuss

