Reply to thread

See what others are reading now! Try Forums > Current Activity

Message: <blockquote data-quote="speed2horizon" data-source="post: 4058206" data-attributes="member: 30831">basically, e-manage n safc are also piggyback. But the parameters involve in tunning are different. An safc is user tuned based piggyback. It only involves rpm n +- fuel with 2 different throttle position. Hi or low throttle. So, total 16 set point. Where e-manage is more sophicated. It involves rpm, throttle position in percentage, input of fuel injection n also reading for maf/map. So, total of 256 set value. So, which one do u think would be more reliable in the product's reliability.fuel tank should be given together with the halfcut. If using iswara, just change the fuel pump.heard Jian Hang at batucaves created a set of 4-2-1 for campro @ neo according to the mugen design with the bryon detachable. Heard he say will feel the engine lighter.high cams?? Gti/putra cams already have higher lift compare to 4g91. To achieve a 1.6 stroker, all u need is the bore up to 81mm. Cause the stroke are the same as 4g92 mivec, 77.5mm. By choosing 4g92 mivec pistons, u'll achieve 1.6L with 11:1 compression ratio. High enough for an NA. Equivalent to vtec b16b. So, why gen2 pistons? Piston pin all different, why all thVe hassle where u can use something plug n play...Porting head is something relative to individual. But a proper port n polish will require a bench flow test to make sure the flow in each port n runners are even. So far, only matspeed n nasty port flow have the benchflow. E manage + safc??? WTF is that? Microtech??! No need la. The ecu good enuf to handle. Btw, bro please give correct infomation n not just bantai only. Some ppl really get info from Zth. But if thigs.if the BTDC of the cams are set properlly. Can really feel the diff.</blockquote>